Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Case file deviqa-41

QA services for retail operations platform

grade B, partial Named client; no metric states both a baseline and a method.

Historical: older than 60 months, counted at half weight in case volume

Claim ledger

Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.

KindVendor claim (quoted)BeforeAfterBaselineMethod
execution-time“an automated regression workflow for the new mobile applications that ran 4× faster” (grade B, baseline no)not stated4x fasternono
defects“65% more bugs were found after the integration of our QA team” (grade B, baseline no)not stated65% morenono
coverage“95% of Mobile and Web apps are covered with test cases” (grade B, baseline yes)Lack of test cases95%yesno
other“Functional testing is executed on different 9+ real iOS/Android devices” (grade B, baseline yes)Lack of testing on real devices9+ real iOS/Android devicesyesno
baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Engagement facts

Client
SimpliField stated
Industry
Retail operations software stated
Client type
not disclosed
Frameworks
Appium and Postman and Newman stated
Languages
TypeScript stated
CI tools
CircleCI stated
Device or browser clouds
BrowserStack stated
Team size
3 stated
Duration in months
not disclosed
Start year
2020 stated
Publication date
not disclosed

What this case does not tell you

  • Client type
  • Duration in months
  • Publication date
  • How or over what period any metric was measured

Source

QA services for retail operations platform (deviqa.com)

accessed 2026-11-11, verified 2026-11-11

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.