Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Case file qawerk-2

ChitChat

grade B, partial Named client without a baselined metric.

Claim ledger

Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.

KindVendor claim (quoted)BeforeAfterBaselineMethod
coverage“a ratio of approximately 70% automated tests to 30% manual tests” (grade B, baseline no)not stated70% automatednono
other“In total, ChitChat was tested on 24 iOS and Android devices.” (grade B, baseline no)not stated24 devicesnono
defects“99% of bugs or missed requirements caught well before they hit the production system” (grade B, baseline no)not stated99%nono
baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Engagement facts

Client
ChitChat stated
Industry
Social commerce and payments app stated
Client type
not disclosed
Frameworks
Appium, WebdriverIO and Postman and Newman stated
Languages
TypeScript stated
CI tools
not disclosed
Device or browser clouds
BrowserStack stated
Team size
4 stated
Duration in months
not disclosed
Start year
not disclosed
Publication date
not disclosed

What this case does not tell you

  • Client type
  • CI tools
  • Duration in months
  • Start year
  • Publication date
  • A metric with a before value (baseline)
  • How or over what period any metric was measured

Source

ChitChat (qawerk.com)

accessed 2026-11-11, verified 2026-11-11

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.