Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Framework note

Appium: what the published cases show

Research desk, testautomationvendors.com · published 2026-11-12 · data as of 2026-11-12 · 47 records

47
verified cases
10
vendors
13 of 47
name the client
55 of 125
metrics with a baseline

47 verified cases in this dataset name Appium, published by 10 vendors. Grades: A 1, B 18, C 28. 13 of 47 name the client, and 55 of 125 published metrics state a baseline.

What stands out

  1. 01Codoid publishes 12 of the 47 Appium cases; the three vendors with the most publish 30, so a reader is looking at a concentrated set of sources.
  2. 0255 of 125 metrics in these cases state a before value; across all 639 metrics in the dataset the count is 209.
  3. 031 of 47 reach grade A, which needs a named client and one metric with both a before value and a stated method.
  4. 04The field left out most often is start year: 36 of 47 cases do not state it.

Counts come from verified records. A baseline is the before value a vendor states for a metric; quoted claims carry their grade and baseline flag.

baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

01Cases, vendors and grades

The count covers every verified case whose text names Appium, including vendors outside the ranked 12.

Vendors with cases: a1qa (6), Abstracta (2), Codoid (12), DeviQA (12), QAwerk (1), Qualitest (4), TestDevLab (2), TestFort (4), Testrig Technologies (3) and Zuci Systems (1).

Cases, vendors and grades
Table view
ItemCount
Grade A1
Grade B18
Grade C28
Total47

02Clients and industries

Named clients appear in 13 cases; 34 keep the client anonymous.

Industries stated: Banking (2), Cryptocurrency wallet (2), Childcare management software (1), Cloud customer support software (1), Construction quality management software (1), Consumer lending (1), E-Commerce (1) and E-commerce (food delivery) (1).

Client types stated: enterprise (6), startup (2) and smb (1).

03Metric kinds and baselines

The Appium cases publish 125 metrics. 55 state a baseline and 5 state both a baseline and a method.

  • “Cut combined mobile + web regression execution to ~35 minutes (from multi-day cycles)”before multi-day cycles after ~35 minutes Abstracta abstracta-2 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
  • “Regression cycle reduced from 4 days to 3 hours.”before 4 days after 3 hours Codoid codoid-1 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
  • “700+ autotests were migrated to a new framework”before Outdated autotests for the Chrome extension after 700+ autotests DeviQA deviqa-8 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
  • “70+ performance scripts were created using K6 and JMeter”before No performance tests after 70+ performance scripts DeviQA deviqa-8 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
  • “Covered ~95% functionality with BE tests”before No back-end autotests after ~95% functionality DeviQA deviqa-8 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
  • “15+ jobs were configured to monitor the critical features daily”before Critical features weren’t monitored after 15+ jobs DeviQA deviqa-8 grade B, partial baseline yes method no
Metric kindMetricsWith baseline
other3019
execution-time279
suite-size2413
coverage2012
defects101
cost80
release-frequency61

04Languages, CI tools and clouds named alongside

Languages: Java (16), JavaScript (8), TypeScript (8), C# (5), Ruby (3), Kotlin (1) and Python (1).

CI tools: Jenkins (19), GitHub Actions (7), CircleCI (5), Bamboo (2), AWS CodeCommit (1), Azure DevOps (1), Bitrise (1) and GitLab (1).

Device or browser clouds: BrowserStack (16), LambdaTest (4), AWS (2), AWS Device Farm (2), Sauce Labs (2) and BlazeMeter (1).

05Migration flows

No verified case tags a migration into or out of Appium.

06The evidence ladder

Each row counts the Appium cases that make that disclosure; the rows are separate counts, ordered from the most basic disclosure to grade A. Of 47 Appium cases, 1 reach grade A, and the rarest disclosure below it is "reach grade a" (1 cases).

The right-hand column gives the same steps for all 263 verified cases, so a reader can set this subset against the whole dataset.

The evidence ladder
Table view
ItemCount
Name a listed framework47
Name the client13
Publish at least one metric36
State a baseline for a metric13
State baseline and method for one metric2
Reach grade A1
Total112
StepAppium casesAll verified cases
Name a listed framework47 of 47263 of 263
Name the client13 of 4791 of 263
Publish at least one metric36 of 47210 of 263
State a baseline for a metric13 of 4775 of 263
State baseline and method for one metric2 of 4735 of 263
Reach grade A1 of 4718 of 263

07Frameworks named alongside Appium

40 of 47 cases name at least one other listed framework. The pairing shows which stacks vendors describe together, not which combination works.

Frameworks named alongside Appium
Table view
ItemCount
Postman and Newman15
Selenium WebDriver15
Apache JMeter11
Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave11
WebdriverIO8
Cypress7
Playwright7
REST Assured4
Total78

08Where the cases come from

Codoid (12), DeviQA (12) and a1qa (6) publish the most Appium cases. A vendor with many cases here shows breadth of published work; the grade columns show how much of it can be checked.

VendorCasesGrade A or BWith a baselined metric
Codoid1221
DeviQA121211
a1qa600
Qualitest400
TestFort400
Testrig Technologies300
Abstracta221
TestDevLab220
QAwerk110
Zuci Systems100

09What vendors leave out

18 of 47 cases do not state a team size and 34 do not state a duration.

8 of 125 metrics are cost figures and 0 mention flakiness, so maintenance cost and flaky test rates are rarely published.

10Questions for a Appium proposal

Ask for suite size and run time before and after the work: 37 of 47 cases give no before value for either.

Ask for the flaky test rate over a stated number of runs: 0 of 125 metrics mention flakiness at all.

Ask who owns maintenance after hand-over and what it costs per month: 8 of 125 metrics are cost figures.

Ask for a reference client you can call: 34 of 47 cases keep the client anonymous.

Questions

How many vendors have published Appium cases?

10 vendors in this dataset, with 47 verified cases between them, as of the dataAsOf date on this page.

How many Appium cases name the client?

13 of 47. A named client is required for grade A.

Do Appium case studies publish baselines?

55 of 125 metrics state a before value.

Does this page rank Appium against other frameworks?

No. The site counts which vendors have evidence on a framework and never compares frameworks.

Records used

This post reads 47 records; the newest verifiedOn date among them sets the data-as-of date.

Show record ids

a1qa-10, a1qa-14, a1qa-24, a1qa-40, a1qa-66, a1qa-73, abstracta-1, abstracta-2, codoid-1, codoid-6, codoid-9, codoid-11, codoid-13, codoid-15, codoid-18, codoid-23, codoid-25, codoid-26, codoid-30, codoid-39, deviqa-8, deviqa-12, deviqa-15, deviqa-18, deviqa-19, deviqa-21, deviqa-25, deviqa-30, deviqa-37, deviqa-38, deviqa-41, deviqa-46, qawerk-2, qualitest-1, qualitest-2, qualitest-3, qualitest-12, testdevlab-1, testdevlab-3, testfort-9, testfort-10, testfort-11, testfort-28, testrig-6, testrig-8, testrig-10, zuci-systems-7

More from the blog

Framework note

Playwright: what the published cases show

48verified cases

48 verified cases from 14 vendors name Playwright: grades, client types, metric kinds, stacks and the fields vendors leave out.

data as of 2026-11-12 · 48 records

Framework note

Cypress: what the published cases show

25verified cases

25 verified cases from 10 vendors name Cypress: grades, client types, metric kinds, stacks and the fields vendors leave out.

data as of 2026-11-12 · 25 records

Framework note

Selenium WebDriver: what the published cases show

88verified cases

88 verified cases from 13 vendors name Selenium WebDriver: grades, client types, metric kinds, stacks and the fields vendors leave out.

data as of 2026-11-12 · 88 records

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.